A Logical Criticism of the Articles of Religious Belief
Resource tools
File information | File size | Options |
Original JPG File1755 × 1755 pixels (3.08 MP) 14.9 cm × 14.9 cm @ 300 PPI | 76 KB | Download |
Screen800 × 800 pixels (0.64 MP) 6.8 cm × 6.8 cm @ 300 PPI | 48 KB | Download |
PreviewScreen Preview | 48 KB | View |
Resource ID
1282
Access
Open
Contributed by
Frederik Wellmann
type of material
A. MS.
Category
LOGIC (MS 339-1009)
description
The contempt for religious faith in scientific circles reveals, not open-mindedness, but prejudice. Deduction, induction, and retroduction are the only kinds of reasoning. Deduction as either necessary or probable. Determinism and free will. Over-specialization on the part of the average scientist has made him culturally ignorant - a queer mixture of enlightenment and of what is the equivalent of superstition. Laws of nature. Miracles and ultramiracles. Two of the alternative sections contain a discussion of existential graphs.
general index
Deduction, necessary definitory (see also Necessity), etymology of probable definitory (see also Probability), Determinism (see also Necessitarianism), Free will, Graphs existential, Induction, Law(s) of nature, Miracles, Probability and Chance, necessary Reasoning, Religion, Religion and faith, Religion and science, Retroductions (see also Abduction), Science, Science and religion
pagination
pp. 1-18, with several alternative sections
Date
1911-04-05, 1911-04-07
manuscript number
856
publication
n.p.
topic
LOGIC / PRACTICAL LOGIC, NOTES, FRAGMENTS
manuscript contains non-textual content
no