The Proper Treatment of Hypotheses: a Preliminary Chapter toward an Examination of Hume's Argument against Miracles in its Logic and in its History
File information | File size | Options |
Original JPG File1755 × 1755 pixels (3.08 MP) 14.9 cm × 14.9 cm @ 300 PPI |
76 KB | Download |
Screen800 × 800 pixels (0.64 MP) 6.8 cm × 6.8 cm @ 300 PPI |
48 KB | Download |
PreviewScreen Preview |
48 KB | View |
Resource ID
1117
Access
Open
Contributed by
Frederik Wellmann
Category
LOGIC (MS 339-1009)
type of material
A. MS.
manuscript number
692
publication
n.p.
description
Opposition to the dualism of reason and instinct. Dogs can reason on occasions, with an example from CSP's experience. Rudimentary sense of logic (logica utens) and the sophisticated sense of logic (logica docens). Attack on modern books on logic. Precepts and hypotheses. The three stages in the life of a hypothesis, each stage governed by entirely different logical principles. Abduction, deduction, and induction.
topic
LOGIC / PRACTICAL LOGIC, NOTES, FRAGMENTS
manuscript contains non-textual content
no
general index
Abduction, Deduction, Hume David, Hypothesis (see also Abduction; Induction), Induction, Instinct, Logic (modal see Modality), Logica docens, Logica utens, Miracles, Precepts
pagination
pp. 1-38, 29-40, and 13 pp. of variants
Date
1901